Five checks before you rely on it
Look for a revenue source, an age, a named operator, a clear list of what is refused, and an export function. A service with all 5 is far more likely to be there next year, and each missing check is a specific risk rather than a vague worry.
The question is not whether a service is honest but whether it is sustainable. Those are different properties and only the second predicts whether it exists in a year.
On this page
A revenue source you can name
Pricing page, visible advertising, a parent company with a business. If you cannot name where the money comes from, the answer is usually investment, and investment has an end. This check is first because it decides the others.
An age and a history
A service running for 2 years has survived at least one funding decision. Look for dated posts, a changelog, or an archive of the site. Longevity is the most boring signal and the most reliable.
A named operator and a clear refusal list
Both reduce legal exposure, which is a real cause of sudden closure in this category. A service that names who runs it and states plainly what it will not do has done the work that keeps it alive.
An export you have tested
Not the presence of a button but a file you have actually downloaded. Export is the first feature to break and the last to be fixed, and testing it once tells you whether your material is really yours.
The questions free things deserve
Does a polished site mean stability?
No. Design is cheap and hardware is not. A plain site with a pricing page is a better sign than a beautiful one without.
Is a big user count reassuring?
Only with revenue. Without it, a large free user base is a larger bill and a shorter runway.
What if a service passes none of the 5?
Use it and keep nothing important in it. That is a reasonable position and it is different from avoiding it.
Run the 5 checks on this site before you rely on it.
Open the free chat